Merit

Supports grant panels with structured first reads so scoring stays consistent and explainable.

MRGovernmentFair evaluation

Grant application reviewer

Grant rounds overwhelm panels. Inconsistent first reads create fairness risk and slow awards to good programmes.

Merit extracts the facts a panel asked for, flags missing evidence, and never issues the award. Humans score; the agent prepares.

Faster, more even evaluation without automating a political decision.

Flags suspicious benefit claims earlier, with fewer false positives and a reason every investigator can read.

Watches operational activity against the policies you are already held to, and raises exceptions for human review.

Makes contracts, vendors, and spend patterns visible enough that leadership can defend a purchase.

Structures incoming records requests, tracks statutory clocks, and drafts a first pack for a human officer.

We will map the workflow, the data, and the people who must be able to explain it — then propose a scoped pilot.